Vietnam is not the next China

The politics may be similar, but let's face it, Vietnam is a much smaller economy than China.
Vietnam is often compared to China. Consider the obvious: they are both communist countries; VietnamÆs laws are often mirror images of Chinese rules, just translated into Vietnamese; and Vietnam is a rising manufacturing hub that boasted a booming GDP growth of 8.5% in 2007.

But on Friday, the Royal Bank of Scotland issued a research report titled, Vietnam: Not Another China, that puts right that myth by stating another obvious: Vietnam ôlacks the same scale advantages. Its impact on global trade and inflation will also be marginalö.

The report concedes that comparisons to China in the 1990s, particularly southern China, make sense. Hourly manufacturing wages are around $0.50, which puts it among the lowest in emerging Asia. Plus North Asian manufacturers are investing in Vietnam û indeed they accounted for half of total foreign investment in the country in the past five years. And Vietnam has been pouring money into its infrastructure system û from roads to ports, it's determined to be user-friendly, just as the six-lane smooth-as-silk highways in China are.

However, the RBS report points out that in the end VietnamÆs impact on global trade will be marginal. ôVietnamÆs population, at 84 million, is smaller than that of Guangdong province (93 million), neighbouring Hong Kong. Moreover, Guangdong province accounts for just 30%, rather than 100%, of ChinaÆs total exports, and has the advantage of drawing on the workforce in its neighbouring provinces, in particular Guangxi (47 million), Hunan (63 million), and Sichuan (82 million).ö

According to RBS this is good news for the global economy. ôRelocating labour-intensive production to Vietnam from China will have little impact on global consumer goods inflation. Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the United States accounted for the large share of foreign investment in China during the past decade. The median hourly manufacturing wage for these countries was $12.97 in 2005 versus $1.06 in China. The labour-cost saving of moving to China was thus large. The hourly manufacturing wage in Vietnam is just $0.60, by contrast, meaning the labour-cost saving of moving to Vietnam from China is far smaller.ö

And thereÆs also some good news for China. RBS reckons that ChinaÆs labour-intensive manufacturing is what is gradually migrating to Vietnam. However, capital-intensive production will likely remain in China as barriers to entry are higher and profit margins wider. And it was capital-intensive exports that explained 64% of ChinaÆs export growth in the second half of last year û so China's keeping the quality of manufacturing.

Furthermore, a recent survey of Hong Kong-owned mainland Chinese factories indicated that just 14% of respondents are considering switching production to Vietnam, while 29% are thinking of remaining in China and simply moving further inland where land and labour costs are lower.

The report agrees with those who say Vietnam is the next Asian Tiger, itÆs just not the next China.
¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.
Share our publication on social media
Share our publication on social media